GST का सुप्रिटेंडेंट एक व्यापारी से ले रहा था 2 लाख की रिश्वत, CBI ने रंगे हाथों किया गिरफ्तार

 









भोपाल में CBI ने बड़ी कार्रवाई करते हुए GST के सुप्रिंटेंडेंट को 2 लाख की रिश्वत लेते हुए रंगे हाथों गिरफ्तार किया. एक व्यापारी ने रिश्वत मांगने की शिकायत CBI से की थी. CBI ने GST के सुप्रिंटेंडेंट चार ठिकानों पर भी छापा मारा. तलाशी की कार्रवाई अभी जारी है.

भोपाल के एक व्यापारी पीयूष पर जीएसटी ने एक करोड़ की रिकवरी निकाली थी. सूत्रों ने बताया कि इसी रिकवरी में सेटलमेंट के नाम पर जीएसटी के दो सुप्रिडेंट स्तर के अधिकारियों ने रिश्वत की मांग की थी. आरोप है कि सुप्रिडेंट अंकुर खंडेलवाल और चेतन सक्सेना ने सेटलमेंट के लिए 10 लाख रुपये की रिश्वत मांगी थी. हालांकि फिर 6 लाख रुपये पर बात तय हुई.

CBI ने इस पूरे मामले की प्राथमिक जांच के बाद दोनों अधिकारियों के खिलाफ सबूत जुटाए और अफसर को पकड़ने के लिए जाल बिछाया. इसके बाद जब पीयूष अरेरा हिल्स स्थित जीएसटी के ऑफिस में रिश्वत की पहली किश्त 2 लाख लेकर पहुंचा. जैसे ही उसने अंकुर खंडेलवाल को 2 लाख रुपए दिए, वैसे ही CBI की टीम ने उसे दबोच लिया. हालांकि, चेतन सक्सेना वहां से गायब हो गया. सीबीआई की टीम ने अंकुर खंडेलवाल और चेतन सक्सेना के 4 संभावित स्थानों पर दबिश दी है. वहां सर्चिंग की कार्रवाई की जा रही है. सीबीआई इस एंगल पर जांच कर रही है कि इन अफसरों ने और कितने व्यापारियों से तो इस तरह की रिश्वत ली है.



Download our App to get knowledge updates: https://play.google.com




Join Our Telegram Channel for more updates:https://t.me/praveengst:





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GST Updates 22.07.2021

Image
Namaskar🙏 🇮🇳 GST Updates 22.07.2021 Join our Telegram Channel📚 https://t.me/praveengst 1️⃣ Today is the due date to File GSTR-3B for the Quarter Apr-June 2021 (QRMP Taxpayer < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category I States. 2️⃣ CBIC Circular No. 156 issued- Clarification regarding extension of limitation under GST Law in terms of Hon’ble Supreme Court’s Order dated 27.04.2021. 3️⃣ Arrest, search, summons under GST law not to be affected by Supreme Court’s limitation order: CBIC. 4️⃣ Centre begins review of legal issues in GST such as such as ervices provided by back offices of MNC in India qualify as exports, which are zero-rated and Discounts, reimbursed by FMCG and consumer durables companies to their dealers to sell products at specially reduced prices. 5️⃣ PIL in SC seeks direction to Centre to constitute GST Tribunal. Ask your GST Query❓ gstmitraapp@gmail.com Ask Live on GSTMITRA YouTube Every Saturday 4 PM Regards CA. Praveen Sharma Your's GST Mitra www.thegstmitra.com +91 987153...
Read more

Centre-State action to plug GST revenue leak

Image
  GST officers of Andhra Pradesh and the Central governments met here on Thursday to discuss ways to plug revenue leak through coordinated efforts and information sharing. They have drawn up an action plan to monitor and pursue cases where GST returns were not filed, particularly in businesses with a turnover of over `5 crore. In the last four years since the implementation of GST, the major source of revenue leakage has been the unlawful or bogus claims related to Input Tax Credit (ITC) with fictitious invoices, according to the officials. They said close coordination between the state and the Central tax departments was vital to identify the sources of these bogus invoices and claimants of false ITC. “All these issues have been thoroughly discussed in the meeting and decisions have been taken on the modalities for sharing data, intelligence, orders, joint investigations, periodic analysis of different sectors,” Special Chief Secretary (Revenue-Commercial Taxes) Rajat Bhargava, wh...
Read more

GST row: Karnataka HC asks govt to consider refund of Rs 27 cr to Swiggy

Image
  The Karnataka High Court has asked the revenue department to consider refund of Rs 27.51 crore to Bundl Technologies, which operates food delivery platform Swiggy. The company had alleged that this money was collected from it by coercion during investigation by the Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax (intelligence) relating to alleged wrongful availment of input tax credit. The court ruled that “right of refund …would be independent of the process of investigation and two cannot be linked together…”. It asked the department to pass a suitable order on refunds within a period of four weeks. The Swiggy owner contended that it deposited Rs 15 crore in the first tranche, followed by Rs 12.51 crore in the second in 2019 under coercion to secure the release of its directors who were summoned and locked up with threat of arrest. It also said that no show cause notice was issued by the officers even after months have passed since investigation was initiated. The court also disc...
Read more